California loosens rules on where sex offenders can live

California officials announced Thursday the state will stop enforcing a key provision of a voter-approved law that prohibits all registered sex offenders from living near schools.

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said it will no longer impose the blanket restrictions outlined in Jessica’s Law, which prevented all sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park, regardless of whether their crimes involved children. Full Article

Related

UT San Diego

SF Chronicle

CBS Sacramento

KCRA

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

45 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What are the practical answers to someone who may be homeless, with progressive illnesses or drug and alcohol issues? I haven’t read about any solutions or places they are able to seek help. Are they just expected to slowly wither away on the streets? Once someone loses basic housing or human functional and physical capabilities, the spiral downward complicates regaining a positive outlook or reality. If you have lost housing, then become physically ill, or depressed, where do you go, who do you call? If you do seek hospitalization for depression related problems, are you now a “mentally disordered sex offender”? I would think, with all the people that have experienced these scenarios, there would have been some organization of resources or ideas for people to glean some solutions. If you are living in O.C., is it a wise idea to move to counties that have more resources, are there others that are more helpful than others, etc? I haven’t seen any substantive information on these issues?

It’s still blanket restrictions and they consider anyone convicted ofewd conduct with minor under 14 are pedophiles when there not. Definition of a pedophiles is a sexual attraction to prepubesent children and like so many others I have never nor will I ever have a sexual attraction to prepubesent children. I was convicted for attempting to have sex with a sexually mature and allegedly sexually active young female although socially and morally unaceptable it is not pedophilia and its wrong and unjust to be catorgorized as a pedophile simply because of the age of the alleged victim.

…key provision of a voter-approved law that prohibits ALL registered sex offenders from living near schools…

This is a false statement from the article and a key cornerstone for media’s role in the chaos. They never take time to break down the difference between which subgroups are affected by various aspects of the law and tend to treat all registrants as if they are untreated and just bursting out of incarceration as though they haven’t done their sentences.

These are the types of generalizations that have continued to muddy the waters with the need for polarizing alarmist views and above all; Ratings…